Ancilla Iuris

Lagen des Rechts
Constellations of Law


The Autopoietic Turn in Habermas’ Legal Philosophy

Ancilla Iuris 2014

Article PDF


Since the publication of Between Facts and Norms, it appears to have gone largely unremarked by critical theorists that Habermas has wholly abandoned the neo-Parsonian systems-theoretic account of social systems developed in his middle period. In this paper, I argue not only that Habermas has developed a new vocabulary and theoretical structure for dealing with social systems such as law, but also that this new approach to social systems is incompatible with the neo-Parsonianism of social systems developed in that arly work. This is not to say that Habermas’ work in Between Facts and Norms should be set aside, but rather that the Parsonianism of The Theory of Communicative Action must be abandoned if Habermas’ jurisprudential project is to go ahead.

How to quote this article
Kevin W. Gray , The Autopoietic Turn in Habermas’ Legal Philosophy, in: Ancilla Iuris ( 2014, 41-57.

The text is subject to a non-commercial Creative Commons license
(CC BY 4.0).